The Economics of Climate Change

By Nicholas Stern (2007)

A report commissioned by the UK government and led by economist Lord Nicholas Stern, published in 2007 and is free to download, ‘The Stern Review’ was a landmark report that used the same cost-benefit (IAM) analysis framework developed by William Nordhaus, but concluded that immediate and decisive action on climate change is the best economic pathway.

Stern estimated climate change damages of at least 5% of today’s GDP now and forever, rising by a further 2-3% if you include tipping points, another 6% to include non-market damages (value of life and the environment), and another third higher if you adjust for regional inequality. A worst case 20% of GDP.

The report highlights “given the state of knowledge, alternate technologies do not appear, on balance, to have the inherent advantages over fossil fuel technologies (eg in costs energy density or suitability in transport), necessary if decarbonisation were to be brought about purely by private commercial decisions. Strong policy will therefore need to provide the incentives”. Stern advocates for cap and trade programs and command and control policy. He saw carbon capture and biofuels as extremely important technology options.

The report is now over a decade old but the majority of content is still relevant and the report makes for an excellent introduction on many aspects of climate change. At 700 pages its not a light read but it is clearly written, not too heavy on acronyms and equations, and walks the reader through a very logical narrative. For a newcomer I would recommend reading ‘The Stern Report’ before the 5,000 pages of IPCC reports which require a far greater starting knowledge base.

Some established climate economists such as William Nordhaus were openly critical of the report’s conclusions, the low discount rate used to bring future damages into the equivalent of today’s money, and accused Stern of inflating damage estimates. Many others praised the comprehensive report and actionable conclusions. I think ‘The Stern Review’ sparked a much needed debate on the economics of climate change and with hindsight seems very prescient. Since the report was written Stern has proved overly pessimistic on technology costs given the huge decline in the price of wind and solar but, for me, this goes to show how important endogenous (respond to the model not fixed) technology assumptions are for economic-climate models - the reason why I integrate technology experience curves into my path to net-zero.



Previous
Previous

The Climate Casino

Next
Next

Pricing the Planet’s Future